Difference between revisions of "LGenerics"
Line 165: | Line 165: | ||
==Algorithms on graphs== | ==Algorithms on graphs== | ||
− | For performance comparison the AGraph library taken from [https://github.com/zamtmn/zcad/tree/master/cad_source/other/AGraphLaz here] was chosen as a reference implementation. All tests were compiled for x86 and run on win64 machine (unfortunately the 64-bit version of AGraph crashes on these tests). | + | For performance comparison the AGraph library (taken from [https://github.com/zamtmn/zcad/tree/master/cad_source/other/AGraphLaz here]) was chosen as a reference implementation. All tests were compiled for x86 and run on win64 machine (unfortunately the 64-bit version of AGraph crashes on these tests). |
+ | So, AGraph vs LGenerics: | ||
+ | |||
+ | {| class="wikitable" | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | ! algorithm !! graph !! AGraph time(ms) !! LGenerics time(ms) !! notes | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BFS traversal || undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 640 ||style="text-align:right"| 109 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | BFS traversal || directed, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 484 ||style="text-align:right"| 94 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Connected components || undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 764 ||style="text-align:right"| 0 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Strongly connected components || directed, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 1060 ||style="text-align:right"| 360 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Single-source shortest path || undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 3011 ||style="text-align:right"| 842 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Single-source shortest path || directed, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 2153 ||style="text-align:right"| 718 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Single-pair shortest path || undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 2777 ||style="text-align:right"| 31 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Single-pair shortest path || directed, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 1825 ||style="text-align:right"| 47 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Minimum spanning tree || undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 ||style="text-align:right"| 5974 ||style="text-align:right"| 640 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Maximum flow || dense, V=1000, E=499500 ||style="text-align:right"| 29499 ||style="text-align:right"| 47 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Maximum flow || sparse, V=64000, E=512000 ||style="text-align:right"| 3339 ||style="text-align:right"| 63 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Planarity test || undirected, V=219086, E=657252 ||style="text-align:right"| 1419 ||style="text-align:right"| 172 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Maximum clique || DIMACS brock200_2.clq, V=200, E=9876 ||style="text-align:right"| 84210 ||style="text-align:right"| 16 || | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | | Maximum clique || DIMACS brock200_4.clq, V=200, E=13089 ||Cancelled(timeout 1 h)||style="text-align:right"| 312 || | ||
+ | |} | ||
==Algorithms on strings and sequences== | ==Algorithms on strings and sequences== |
Revision as of 18:49, 12 March 2022
About
Collection of generic algorithms and data structures for Free Pascal.
Requires: FPC 3.2+, Lazarus 1.9+.
Author: A.Koverdyaev (avk)
License: Apache License 2.0
Features
Implemented primitives
- stack (unit lgStack)
- queue (unit lgQueue)
- deque (unit lgDeque)
- vector (unit lgVector)
- vector of bits (unit lgVector)
- priority queue based on binary heap (unit lgPriorityQueue)
- priority queue with key update and melding based on pairing heap (unit lgPriorityQueue)
- sorted list (unit lgList)
- hashed list - array based list with the ability to fast search by key (unit lgList)
- hashset (unit lgHashSet)
- fine-grained concurrent hashset (unit lgHashSet)
- sorted set (unit lgTreeSet)
- set of arbitrary size (unit lgUtil, TGSet)
- hash multiset (unit lgHashMultiSet)
- fine-grained concurrent hashmultiset (unit lgHashMultiSet)
- sorted multiset (unit lgTreeMultiSet)
- hashmap (unit lgHashMap)
- fine-grained concurrent hashmap (unit lgHashMap)
- sorted map (unit lgTreeMap)
- hash multimap (unit lgMultiMap)
- tree multimap (unit lgMultiMap)
- list miltimap (unit lgMultiMap)
- bijective map (unit lgBiMap)
- sparse 2D table (unit lgTable2D)
- disjoint set (unit lgHashSet)
- AVL tree (unit lgAvlTree)
- red-black tree (unit lgRbTree)
- some treap variants (unit lgTreap)
- general rooted tree (unit lgRootTree)
- sparse labeled undirected graph (unit lgSimpleGraph)
- sparse labeled directed graph (unit lgSimpleDigraph)
- lite containers based on advanced records
- extended IEnumearble interface - filtering, mapping, etc.
Algorithms on graphs
- core functions:
- vertices/edges addition/removal/query/enumeration, edge contraction, degree
- load/save to own binary format, primitive export to DOT format
- connectivity:
- connected/strongly connected components, bipartite detection, degeneracy, k-core
- articulation points, bridges, biconnected components
- edge-connectivity
- traversals:
- BFS/DFS traversals with visitors,
- cycle/negative cycle detection,
- topological sort
- operations:
- induced subgraphs, complement, reverse, union, intersect, symmetric difference,
- chordality testing
- planarity testing: FMR Left-Right Planarity algorithm
- distance within graph:
- eccentricity, radius, diameter, center, periphery
- matching:
- maximum cardinality matching on bipartite/arbitrary graphs
- minimum/maximum weight matching on bipartite graphs
- dominators in flowgraps: simple iterative and Semi-NCA algorithms
- some suggestions for NP-hard problems:
- maximum independent set, maximal independent sets enumeration
- maximum clique, cliques enumeration
- minimum vertex cover, minimal vertex covers enumeration
- vertex coloring, approximations and exact
- minimum dominating set
- Hamiltonian cycles and paths
- local search TSP approximations, BnB TSP solver
- minimum spanning trees: Prims's and Kruskal's algorithms
- single source shortest paths:
- Dijkstra with pairing heap, A*, Bellman-Ford-Moor with Tarjan's subtree disassembly(BFMT)
- single pair shortest paths:
- Dijkstra with binary heap, bidirection Dijkstra, A*, NBA*
- all pairs shortest paths:
- Floyd–Warshall, Johnson, BFMT
- networks:
- maximum flow: push/relabel, capacity scaling Dinitz
- minimum-cost flow: Busacker-Gowen, cost scaling push/relabel algorithm
- global minimum cut: Stoer–Wagner, Nagamochi-Ibaraki
Algorithms on arrays and vectors
(mostly unit lgArrayHelpers)
- reverse, right/left cyclic shifts
- permutations
- binary search
- N-th order statistics
- inversion counting
- distinct values selection
- quicksort
- introsort
- dual pivot quicksort
- mergesort
- timsort (unit lgMiscUtils)
- counting sort
- radix sort
- translation of Orson Peters' PDQSort algorithm
- static segment tree
- longest increasing subsequence
- ...
Algorithms on strings and sequences
(units lgStrHelpers, lgSeqUtils)
- exact string matching
- Boyer-Moore string matching algorithm(in Fast Search variant), case sensitive and case insensitive(unit lgStrHelpers)
- Boyer-Moore-Horspool-Raita algorithm(unit lgStrHelpers)
- longest common subsequence of two sequences:
- reducing the LCS problem to LIS
- Kumar-Rangan algorithm for LCS
- Myers algorithm for LCS
- the Levenshtein distance:
- simple DP algorithm
- modified Berghel-Roach algorithm
- Myers bit-vector algorithm with cut-off heuristic
- LCS distance:
- Myers algorithm for LCS distance
- fuzzy string matching(k differences)
- Ukkonen EDP algorithm
- fuzzy string matching with preprocessing(something similar to fuzzywuzzy)
Other
- non-cryptogarphic hashes (unit lgHash):
- Yann Collet's xxHash32, xxHash64
- Austin Appleby's MurmurHash2, MurmurHash2A, MurmurHash3_x86_32, MurmurHash64A
- brief and dirty implementation of futures concept (unit lgAsync)
- brief channel implementation (unit lgAsync)
- brief implementation of thread pool (unit lgAsync)
- 128-bit integers (unit lgInt128)
- JSON validator/parser/generator(unit lgJson)
- Eisel-Lemire fast string-to-double conversion algorithm(unit lgJson)
- Ryū double-to-string conversion algorithm(unit lgJson)
Perfomance
Containers
Hash maps
There is a wonderful benchmark from BeniBela, which also covers hashmaps from LGenerics.
Algorithms on arrays and vectors
Sorting
The benchmark sorts 1000000 integers and calculates the number of CPU cycles spent on one element and involves:
- QuickSort_ItemList_Context from unit SortBase (RTL/SortBase)
- TOrderingArrayUtils.Sort from FCL_STL.GArrayUtils (FCL-Stl)
- TArrayHelper.Sort from Rtl-Generics.Generics.Collections (RTL/Generics)
- std::sort from libstdc++ (std::sort)
- std::stable_sort from libstdc++ (std::stable_sort)
- TGOrdinalArrayHelper.QuickSort (LG/QuickSort)
- TGOrdinalArrayHelper.IntroSort (LG/IntroSort)
- TGOrdinalArrayHelper.DualPivotQuickSort (LG/DualPivotQuickSort)
- TGOrdinalArrayHelper.PDQSort (LG/PDQSort)
- TGComparableArrayHelper.MergeSort (LG/MergeSort)
- TGComparableTimSort.Sort (LG/TimSort)
- TGOrdinalArrayHelper.Sort (LG/Sort)
- A negative value indicates that the algorithm exhibits quadratic behavior.
Algorithms on graphs
For performance comparison the AGraph library (taken from here) was chosen as a reference implementation. All tests were compiled for x86 and run on win64 machine (unfortunately the 64-bit version of AGraph crashes on these tests).
So, AGraph vs LGenerics:
algorithm | graph | AGraph time(ms) | LGenerics time(ms) | notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
BFS traversal | undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 | 640 | 109 | |
BFS traversal | directed, V=500000, E=4000000 | 484 | 94 | |
Connected components | undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 | 764 | 0 | |
Strongly connected components | directed, V=500000, E=4000000 | 1060 | 360 | |
Single-source shortest path | undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 | 3011 | 842 | |
Single-source shortest path | directed, V=500000, E=4000000 | 2153 | 718 | |
Single-pair shortest path | undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 | 2777 | 31 | |
Single-pair shortest path | directed, V=500000, E=4000000 | 1825 | 47 | |
Minimum spanning tree | undirected, V=500000, E=4000000 | 5974 | 640 | |
Maximum flow | dense, V=1000, E=499500 | 29499 | 47 | |
Maximum flow | sparse, V=64000, E=512000 | 3339 | 63 | |
Planarity test | undirected, V=219086, E=657252 | 1419 | 172 | |
Maximum clique | DIMACS brock200_2.clq, V=200, E=9876 | 84210 | 16 | |
Maximum clique | DIMACS brock200_4.clq, V=200, E=13089 | Cancelled(timeout 1 h) | 312 |
Algorithms on strings and sequences
It was curious to compare the performance of the SimRatioLevEx() function (which is inspired by FuzzyWuzzy) with some incarnations of the FuzzyWuzzy (listed here) on benchmark datasets. Disclamer: SimRatioLevEx() does not reproduce FuzzyWuzzy, but it does some things in a similar way, in particular, SimRatioLevEx() in smTokenSetEx mode and token_set_ratio() do roughly the same job.
It seems the C++ version only supports single-byte strings, so only compared to the single-byte version of SimRatioLevEx():
Dataset SimRatioLevEx() token_set_ratio() Short/big_dist 1154 6440 Short/small_dist 967 3020 Medium/big_dist 811 3450 Medium/small_dist 702 1470 Long/big_dist 1966 15000 Long/small_dist 1061 2250
The numbers indicate the run time in milliseconds; the C++ version was compiled with gcc-8.1.0 with options -O3 -m64; the Pascal version was compiled with FPC-3.3.1-9941-g8e6e9bbf33, -O3. The benchmark was run on a Windows x64 machine.
The Go version, on the contrary, always works with Unicode strings:
Dataset SimRatioLevExUtf8() TokenSetRatio() Short/big_dist 2143 18705 Short/small_dist 1593 2224 Medium/big_dist 1266 15062 Medium/small_dist 853 1742 Long/big_dist 3853 79851 Long/small_dist 1269 3126
Go version: go1.10.4 linux/amd64; FPC-3.3.1-10683-g2a19e152b7 -O3. The benchmark was run on a virtual Linux machine.